Despite the safety and anonymity that the internet offers, there is no escaping the fact that publicly stating a pederastic attraction is not only frowned upon by the vast majority of people, but can also have some serious consequences.
Calling someone a pederast (remember that modern mainstream thought functions to-wit: pederast means “pedophile” which in turn means “child molester”) is akin to calling someone a Muslim terrorist. Pederasty is by no means an easy thing to advocate for.
But there are millions and millions of people in the world with such inclination. Make no mistake about it. I would even suggest that there might be more pederasts than androphile gay men (that has been, after all, the norm throughout history). 
This humble blog receives about 4500 daily visits. That’s almost 32000 people a week. Yet only a small minority vote on the polls, an even a smaller minority comment on the posts. This mirrors the situation in the real world. There are millions of pederasts out there, but only a small fraction accept that attraction, and only an even smaller fraction are involved in some sort of activism.
There are four main ways of dealing with pederastic inclinations in modern society:
- Rejection: Those who are attracted to teenage boys will repress all attraction, be it sexual (by not looking at pictures, for example) or emotional (by staying away from any place with a large concentration of adolescent boys).
- Assimilation: A pederast adapts his inclinations to fit in with current norms and standards. Sexual pederastic impulses are repressed (or limited to self-stimulation), while emotional pederastic impulses can be nurtured, but never publicly acknowledged.
- Semi-Activism: A pederast can anonymously fight to change public opinion. Thanks to the internet, it is quite an easy task. Offline, however, he likely will choose the assimilation route.
- Activism: He stands up publicly for what he believes is right. He overtly challenges the status-quo. Often with dire consequences.
While certainly tongue-in-cheek, Jonathan King (here posing as Oscar Wilde) exemplifies the position of outright defiance:
